Zoning Ordinance E-Guide

What skills do planners need to do a better job facilitating communication?

Friday, April 17th, 2009

PortlandMaps.com Rocks!I’m conducting research about technology for urban planning. I’m wondering what technology skills planners working the field would like to acquire that they don’t currently have. What is a mystery such as making your own Google Earth map or perhaps setting up an online community on Facebook?  Do you think planning could be better “packaged” to communities through web sites that help facilitate the implementation of a plan? Do you find it difficult to keep up with all the tools available and when to use what? Don’t you think there needs to be a better tool to publish zoning ordinances online, especially for form based codes?

Is it just me or do you think/worry about these things also?

Geographic Visualization Graphic Types

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Geographic Visualization: the facilitation of understanding any data within a spatial context.

Geographic visualization appears on:

-the computer screen
-high resolution screens
-mobile devices
-the physical environment (projected)
-wayfinding devices (GPS devices)
-scopes and binoculars
-wristwatches
-information kiosks
-vehicle dashboards
-remote sensing displays
-electronic signage
-paper/static materials

..providing a plethora of platforms and interface opportunities depending on the context it is displayed. I am going to break geographic visualization into clusters depending on the presentation platform.

    For Static Publishing (Paper or Screen):

Information Graphics/ Illustrations (Tufte)
Thematic Maps (Static GIS & Wayfinding Maps)
Plans (Static maps of the present and future simultaneously)
Charts & Tables

    For Dynamic Low Resolution Remote Sensing (You are here maps):

Locator Map
Trail/Topography Map
GPS Wayfinding Maps
Traffic Maps
Weather Maps

    For High Resolution Displays (Zoomable):

Photography (Aerial)
Panoramic Photography (360 views from static location)
Video (Motion Graphics)

    For Personal Computer Interactivity (High or Low Resolution):

Globe Explorer/ Geographic Information System
Scenario-based movies
Web-based Maps
Forms, Interfaces, Dashboards

    For the Physical Environment:

2D motion graphics (Projected)
2D Signage Dynamic or Static (See Also Static Publishing)
In-Car Navigation Aid
3D icons, models, and avatars (Augmented)
3D Branded Environmental Graphics (Physical Objects)
Cell Phones
Kindle 2/Portable Devices

Municipal Site Makeover – Standards Needed

Thursday, June 19th, 2008

Finding information such as a city’s zoning ordinance on their web site is not even remotely enjoyable. Every municipality organizes information in a different way—some sites make sense while many do not. Since most cities have practically the same departments and offer the same services online, I believe it is reasonable to create guidelines for municipal web sites.

Guidelines will reduce the variability of navigation, information organization, and functionality of the sites. They can retain their unique identity while reducing the frustration of finding information for the site user.

There are 4 main ingredients on every municipal site. These are temporarily simplified for the purpose of creating a general overview. They include: Schedules and Events, Zoning Ordinance / Online Mapping,  Community Information, and Transactions. Across all 4 categories, accessibility, best-practice, and usability desperately need to be addressed.

Event Calendar, Schedules, Announcements and Meeting Minutes

It seems this is the only section on most municipal sites that actually gets updated! This section should appear on the home page, not a subsequent page the user has to search for. Recent meeting agendas and minutes should also be accessed on the home page. Highlight your announcements! Often the announcements blend in with all the other text on the page and can easily be overlooked.

Online Mapping

This is a sore spot for me. I have been conducting extensive research on how zoning ordinances are located on a municipal site and presented online. I have viewed at least 20 GIS based maps in the recent past. First, locating the online map can be difficult. You might look under Community Development, the Department of Building Code, or even Economic Development to find it. Unfortunately, when I finally do locate a GIS map (and I am web savvy) it is slow to load, cumbersome to navigate, and confusing. If no GIS is available, there usually is a PDF. Sometimes Acrobat crashes when I open it so I try to avoid large PDFs!

At the APA conference in Vegas in April 2008, an ESRI spokesman admitted to a room full of planners that ArcIMS is outdated and not a technology that will sustain itself in the marketplace of online mapping. They admitted Google Earth and others like it are much more user-friendly for community members to use. I’m so pleased they recognize the need for an intuitive mapping platform to present land use and zoning maps! This is their area of expertise, right?

Community Information

Community information is often generic on municipal sites. Sometimes they link directly to a community’s Chamber of Commerce or community organization site. Often they don’t. To find up-to-date information about a community requires a Google and sift technique.

There are so many ways to present community history, development opportunities, photographs, and data using Google Maps and other interactive tools. The opportunity to engage site users (make it interesting) and maintain a detailed database of information (make it useful) across departments is often lost.

Transactions

Transactions includes discussion forums, emailing a department contact, submitting applications, requesting additional information, paying for services, paying parking tickets, etc. Each of these items falls under a different department’s jurisdiction and are usually found throughout a site. This makes sense from an organizational point of view but not from an end-user’s perspective.

The question “What can I do on this site?” should be immediately answered on the home page. Municipal sites should address all the potential needs of site visitors on the home page. A home page is expensive real estate and is not the best place for history or the mayor’s biography.

The opposite problem is providing too much information on the home page. Consider the City of Chicago’s site (below).

City_of_Chicago home

 

Do you know where to look first on this page? Does the organization of this page make sense? It takes me a good 30 seconds to scan. The page is overwhelming; it is trying to do too much at once! I am a consistent user of the site to pay parking tickets (hey! I live in Chicago where there is something wrong with you if you don’t get a ticket at least once a month), look up information, contact departments, find out what is happening around town, find out about the Olympics bid, search the historic properties database, review the zoning map. There are a lot of things you can do here but it isn’t easy despite my familiarity with it.

I propose a packet of guidelines for municipal sites that should be Federally mandated. These guidelines would address how to handle Schedules and Events, Zoning Ordinance / Online Mapping, Community Information, and Transactions according to a basic site architecture, accessibility requirements, and best-practice design and usability standards.

It would also include standards for content management systems and support cross department communication and information sharing.

What if the by-product of these standards streamlined government processes? What if it saved citizens frustration? What if people could actually access and load the zoning map quickly? Then we just might be able to close in on the gap between public and private efficiency. 

 

Moving Towards An Integrated 3D World

Sunday, June 15th, 2008

What is needed from the field of computer graphics is an integrated tool for urban planners and geographers which incorporates geospatial data, 3D content, simulation tools, and the ability to manipulate or change data in a database without altering the scene graph.  All software packages have their limitations, but the fragmentation of scientific visualization software is disheartening.

Not even the EPA can show us innovation or collaboration among geographers and software engineers to assist with environmental sciences decision making. It seems widespread adoption of planning visualization software has not come very far since the late 1990’s. Why?

Perhaps one reason is that it has not been cost effective due to a number of constraints. Computing power (processing power), broadband networking, lack of collaboration and communication of needs between engineers and planners, and the general cost to obtain data can prohibit the progress of a visualization tool or system.

There are a number of tools to accomplish certain tasks.  It can be debated how successful these tools actually are.

What is initially needed is a way to create a 3D scene of the built environment rapidly. This can be done if we only want to represent boxes by extruding polylines in AutoCAD. Or building simple boxes in SketchUp. Boxes can be placed on a map to “represent” buildings.

We can add texture maps to the boxes to represent our buildings as they appear in real space.

Contextual data and site specific features such as landscaping, etc. can be added. The end result is something rigidly engineered. This is only a simulation.  No manipulation of the environment such as user interactivity with a particular site is generally allowed.

The aesthetic vision is to obtain a degree of realism. This actually has a counter effect on the audience because it is hard to respond to a computer generated environment that does not contain people living and breathing there. Therefore, an artistic element must be incorporated into the simulation to appeal to the emotions. Additionally, audio and interactivity add to the experience, reality, and sensory perception.

Because it takes a great deal of effort to generate a 3D simulation, it would be beneficial to the planners if interactivity was well integrated as well as manipulation outputs and visible data.  An integrated system of fiscal costs tied to the realignment of a street are far more beneficial to a planner than only observing the visual impacts of such an alignment.

The software could be further beneficial if it is database driven. If an engineer could set up a city with a visualization tool and the planner could maintain or update it through a GUI (graphic user interface). This could be accomplished with an object-oriented database allowing for the “swapping” of 3D models as the built environment is altered.

The simulation and data integration program becomes further important when we consider all aspects of the visualization tool. Not only are we creating a visual toolkit, but we are creating a communication network. This program will incorporate the above within a networked environment. Planners, engineers, architects all living in different cities should be able to simultaneously enter into the environment and interact with each other in addition to the environment. This can easily be accomplished with video/voice conferencing.

The virtual environment allows for heightened opportunities within the space through the creation of a customizable browser window which corresponds to the content displayed.  If we want to talk about a sign ordinance in a particular corridor, we should be able to select from a library of appropriate signs for our district and replace the signage on the buildings in our corridor.  If we are rezoning a district or creating overlays, we should be able to show visually, with a semi-transparent colored box, the height restrictions within a corridor. One step further, we should be able to build consensus by viewing how people respond to the changes as they happen within the environment in real time. 

Copyright ©2005-2010 PlaceVision Inc., All rights reserved.