Emerging Technologies for Urban Planning

Tell a story to convey a sense of place

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

Google_waveA memorable picture is one that successfully embodies a story in a single visual stroke. Urban planners can use visual strokes to convey a sense of a place told from the perspective of those that live there. Each story is a layer within the context of place, each contributes to the picture as a whole.

Building a community scenario can be difficult because multiple views and values must be considered. Gathering a multitude of stories during a community meeting is nearly impossible. Opening the floor for everyone to speak turns a two-hour meeting into an overnight sleepover. How can planners give everyone an equal opportunity to tell their story to portray a cumulative picture from which focal issues emerge?

Community discussion tools can promote turnout and feedback for an improvement effort. Planners can support community storytelling through a web site using Google maps, image sharing, oral histories, and discussion boards.

The “Imagine New York” public visioning process invited people from all over the world to share their vision of the World Trade Center site’s future. Professional architects and planners were invited to submit drawings and designs to a community bulletin board and image gallery. Community members were invited to tell their unique stories on the web site through blog posts and image galleries. It was the ideal public participation tool because it reached the largest audience possible and supported over 16,000 image entries and visions that were narrowed down roughly to 50.

Communities are more likely to approve development plans if they have a role in shaping it. Beyond the physical community meeting, there are many ways to invite others to participate. Online tools can play a valuable role in gathering stories during visioning and guide the outcome.

Google Maps

Google maps helps you pinpoint key locations in a neighborhood. A community map can be created using Google maps to show key locations.

You could allow community members to upload images and place descriptions on your map during the visioning process. Comments and experiences can be collected and evaluated at a later phase.

Image Sharing

Share photographs or drawings about a neighborhood or a project with an image gallery that supports multiple users. A multi-user image gallery allows community members to upload images to an account. Each member’s gallery contributes to entire gallery of photographs collected.

An image sharing component would most likely appeal to those that are tech savvy. This is a way to garner feedback from a younger generation of users who would otherwise not participate in the planning process by attending community meetings.

Oral Histories

An oral history does not have to be a historical document, it can be a narrative captured on an audio device. Hearing a story from the first person perspective is a powerful story telling tool.

A video recorder or digital recorder can be set up at key locations in a community to capture the story of those that would rather tell their story than write or illustrate it.  The personalized accounts can be easily transcribed and added to the site or formatted and placed in a media library for future reference.

Discussion Boards

A discussion board enables planners to solicit specific feedback by posting a question and engaging in an ongoing dialog. A forum allows users to respond to specific issues or options. It helps members to engage in a continuous feedback loop. This tool can support visioning, FAQs, and plan documentation.

These tools are not difficult to deploy and use. They seem to have less than desirable use by planners for several reasons. Planners are not fully aware of all the technologies available to them. They don’t know how to install them and customize them, so the process of implementation must be demystified. Community members must request these tools to be available and apply pressure to government to provide them. Awareness of specific technologies from both sides will result in more stories being told and more views incorporated into plans that effect every community member.

Building a community scenario doesn’t have to be difficult.  Stories can be told in person, in writing, through pictures, and on video. Planers can give everyone fair chance to be involved in the building of their community.

Government is seeking input

Tuesday, June 9th, 2009

on how the private sector could help them mashup up data Lunchtime Link Round-Up — Sunlight Foundation Blog.

Green Festival Chicago May 16 -17

Thursday, May 7th, 2009

Green Festivals – Schedule (Navy Pier) outlines Saturday and Sunday’s schedules including the Green Home Pavilion talks about gardens, solar, and deconstruction. Interested to hear about the Chicago Climate Action Plan on Saturday.

What skills do planners need to do a better job facilitating communication?

Friday, April 17th, 2009

PortlandMaps.com Rocks!I’m conducting research about technology for urban planning. I’m wondering what technology skills planners working the field would like to acquire that they don’t currently have. What is a mystery such as making your own Google Earth map or perhaps setting up an online community on Facebook?  Do you think planning could be better “packaged” to communities through web sites that help facilitate the implementation of a plan? Do you find it difficult to keep up with all the tools available and when to use what? Don’t you think there needs to be a better tool to publish zoning ordinances online, especially for form based codes?

Is it just me or do you think/worry about these things also?

Geographic Visualization Graphic Types

Wednesday, April 15th, 2009

Geographic Visualization: the facilitation of understanding any data within a spatial context.

Geographic visualization appears on:

-the computer screen
-high resolution screens
-mobile devices
-the physical environment (projected)
-wayfinding devices (GPS devices)
-scopes and binoculars
-wristwatches
-information kiosks
-vehicle dashboards
-remote sensing displays
-electronic signage
-paper/static materials

..providing a plethora of platforms and interface opportunities depending on the context it is displayed. I am going to break geographic visualization into clusters depending on the presentation platform.

    For Static Publishing (Paper or Screen):

Information Graphics/ Illustrations (Tufte)
Thematic Maps (Static GIS & Wayfinding Maps)
Plans (Static maps of the present and future simultaneously)
Charts & Tables

    For Dynamic Low Resolution Remote Sensing (You are here maps):

Locator Map
Trail/Topography Map
GPS Wayfinding Maps
Traffic Maps
Weather Maps

    For High Resolution Displays (Zoomable):

Photography (Aerial)
Panoramic Photography (360 views from static location)
Video (Motion Graphics)

    For Personal Computer Interactivity (High or Low Resolution):

Globe Explorer/ Geographic Information System
Scenario-based movies
Web-based Maps
Forms, Interfaces, Dashboards

    For the Physical Environment:

2D motion graphics (Projected)
2D Signage Dynamic or Static (See Also Static Publishing)
In-Car Navigation Aid
3D icons, models, and avatars (Augmented)
3D Branded Environmental Graphics (Physical Objects)
Cell Phones
Kindle 2/Portable Devices

Demand: Provide mapping advice

Thursday, October 23rd, 2008

Demand: Clients ask you to guide them to the most affordable GIS solution

There are more than a few ways to create an interactive geographic information system. Learn what your options are and how to present them to your clients. Learn how to increase your value as a planning consultant to utilize these tools and integrate them into the planning process.

What is a mashup? How can professionals use this technology?

Tuesday, June 17th, 2008

Wikipedia defines a mashup as a web application that combines data from more than one source into a single integrated tool; an example is the use of cartographic data from Google Maps to add location information to real-estate data, thereby creating a new and distinct web service that was not originally provided by either source.

There seems to be a misconception about what a Google Maps mashup is versus mapping a location on Google Maps. A mashup is seamlessly integrated into your web site by pulling your data from a database and placing it on a Google Map. It mixes your content with a base technology such as Google Maps, Google Earth, or MapQuest. Wheras a “show on Google Maps” link (such as “map this location” seen on Craigslist displays one or two locations on a map. The link leaves your site or opens Google Maps.

There are endless possibilities for Google mashups, especially for professionals who promote and plan built environment projects.  For instance, your portfolio of projects or condos for sale in a neighborhood, city, or region can be featured as a map based gallery. Pushpins for each location with images and details can be featured on your web site.

I first realized the unlimited capabilities of linking information to a simple map when the first mashup was created here in Chicago. A programmer took the Chicago police department’s crime reports and mapped them to Google maps on-the-fly. The map is automatically updated when recent crime information becomes publicly available.

There are several ways to get a mashup on your site. Find a company that specializes in the development of custom mashups. Or find a product that has already been developed to add to your site. Or hire a programmer to develop one for you from scratch. It can be expensive and time consuming to develop your own mashup tool because you have to develop the software first before you can start adding your content to it.

PlaceVision developed Neighborhood Maps, a Google maps mashup tool, for urban planning and historic preservation use. I envisioned turning a firm’s projects into a map based portfolio, or for community organizations, to map historic properties and key places of interest.  I integrated it with Image Gallery to link images from the map to a larger view with more detailed information.

While our mashup tools are not the only products available, we are committed to using these tools for community building and raising awareness of economic or preservation opportunities. I don’t see a lot of web companies specializing in these fields or excited about being a pioneer in industries that are very slow to adopt or change the way they work.

My hope is that urban planners can learn how easy it is to communicate and collaborate with the right tools to create more livable communities. 

Moving Towards An Integrated 3D World

Sunday, June 15th, 2008

What is needed from the field of computer graphics is an integrated tool for urban planners and geographers which incorporates geospatial data, 3D content, simulation tools, and the ability to manipulate or change data in a database without altering the scene graph.  All software packages have their limitations, but the fragmentation of scientific visualization software is disheartening.

Not even the EPA can show us innovation or collaboration among geographers and software engineers to assist with environmental sciences decision making. It seems widespread adoption of planning visualization software has not come very far since the late 1990’s. Why?

Perhaps one reason is that it has not been cost effective due to a number of constraints. Computing power (processing power), broadband networking, lack of collaboration and communication of needs between engineers and planners, and the general cost to obtain data can prohibit the progress of a visualization tool or system.

There are a number of tools to accomplish certain tasks.  It can be debated how successful these tools actually are.

What is initially needed is a way to create a 3D scene of the built environment rapidly. This can be done if we only want to represent boxes by extruding polylines in AutoCAD. Or building simple boxes in SketchUp. Boxes can be placed on a map to “represent” buildings.

We can add texture maps to the boxes to represent our buildings as they appear in real space.

Contextual data and site specific features such as landscaping, etc. can be added. The end result is something rigidly engineered. This is only a simulation.  No manipulation of the environment such as user interactivity with a particular site is generally allowed.

The aesthetic vision is to obtain a degree of realism. This actually has a counter effect on the audience because it is hard to respond to a computer generated environment that does not contain people living and breathing there. Therefore, an artistic element must be incorporated into the simulation to appeal to the emotions. Additionally, audio and interactivity add to the experience, reality, and sensory perception.

Because it takes a great deal of effort to generate a 3D simulation, it would be beneficial to the planners if interactivity was well integrated as well as manipulation outputs and visible data.  An integrated system of fiscal costs tied to the realignment of a street are far more beneficial to a planner than only observing the visual impacts of such an alignment.

The software could be further beneficial if it is database driven. If an engineer could set up a city with a visualization tool and the planner could maintain or update it through a GUI (graphic user interface). This could be accomplished with an object-oriented database allowing for the “swapping” of 3D models as the built environment is altered.

The simulation and data integration program becomes further important when we consider all aspects of the visualization tool. Not only are we creating a visual toolkit, but we are creating a communication network. This program will incorporate the above within a networked environment. Planners, engineers, architects all living in different cities should be able to simultaneously enter into the environment and interact with each other in addition to the environment. This can easily be accomplished with video/voice conferencing.

The virtual environment allows for heightened opportunities within the space through the creation of a customizable browser window which corresponds to the content displayed.  If we want to talk about a sign ordinance in a particular corridor, we should be able to select from a library of appropriate signs for our district and replace the signage on the buildings in our corridor.  If we are rezoning a district or creating overlays, we should be able to show visually, with a semi-transparent colored box, the height restrictions within a corridor. One step further, we should be able to build consensus by viewing how people respond to the changes as they happen within the environment in real time. 

Copyright ©2005-2010 PlaceVision Inc., All rights reserved.